A.I. Gay art is only held back by censorship and stylistic limits of the A.I.

Used Midjourney and got very different results. But there are still limitations.

Sharing helps get the word out. Previous report on failing AI Art Generators at the very end of this post.

Images that follow were generated by Midjourney at https://midjourney.com

The four images on the left and center were generated with the phrase “pantheon of Thai gay gods, the two on the left are from a set of four “pantheon of nNrdic gay gods monochrome.” They are generated in about a minute or less.

---

Ethical considerations

This art uses as its database the art that is on the Internet abstracting ideas and the artistic representation of those ideas from the art to draw its own images.

What could be done is for an artist make a set of images for himself and use those images to be the source for the creating of new images. Or there might be a cooperative where artists have contributed images to have a dataset.

On the other hand, artists for generations have been told to study the Old Masters to learn how to generate art and artists do observe art to learn technique and to develop their own ideas. Now it is a computer algorithm which is doing both of those things.

I think artists should be concerned that their art could be a source for algorithms.

---

No Nudes is Good News for Gay Artists

This was the response when I asked for “nude maile stone temple statue.”

The use of the word “nude” is a banned prompt. I am beginning to notice that the providers of these art generators are very fearful of anything sexual.

Notice the warning “circumventing this filter to violate our rules may result in your access being revoked.” I decided not to try to circumvent the filter.

This person had a long blog that some people were generating sexual imagines.

https://www.kapwing.com/blog/our-ai-art-generator-isnt-being-used-to-generate-art/

So at this time, it seems that A.I. Art generators won’t generate nude images and Gay artists can. Though I haven’t checked all the A.I. Art generators out there.

---

Sameness of the art

Though I generated different images, they all seemed to be similar. Also, for some reason, “gay,” meant shirtless and really developed muscles for the A.I. software. These are some images.

pantheon of african gay gods

pantheon of muscular African Gay gods in the sunlight

The following was “pantheon of muscular African Gay gods in the sunlight surrealistic style.” Looks fairly the same.

Tried to set off surrealistic with a comma as, “pantheon of African Gay gods in the sunlight, surrealistic,” and got the following.

I tried the same thing with “impressionistic style” and got the same thing. Watercolor painting got this.

---

Summary

There are likely limitations with some of these A.I. Art machines but they seem to be capable of generating so failry impressive image.

On the other hand they have censorious rules which preclude them from competing with Gay artists at this time. That might change and not all the A.I. art generators have been tested. This person claims his art is generated by A.I. Click on the post to see the image.

TakiSmut @TakiSmut

He lost his shorts in the surf 👀 #AiArt #GayArt

The art from the Midjourney art generator had a sameness regardless of artistic style asked for. A Gay artists should make sure they have a style that is different than an A.I. art generator.

Subscriptions are free.

This is my earlier report on the failing A.I. Art Generators.

A.I. Art programs won't do Gay art. Tried them and they are worthless for Gay art. Might be wrong on this.