Newsletter 20230605 Pride merchandise, the good and bad. STD vaccine development. Detransitioning debacle is going to be happening.
I am afraid for the trans community that the excesses of the gender movement are going to be driving a damaging backlash.
Subscriptions are free.
Let others know about this newsletter.
Over 300 readers! I hope everyone finds something of interest.
For those who joined for the art, I hope you find the articles about HIV vaccine developments and the other stuff of interest. For those who joined because of my critical analysis of SOME aspects of gender ideology I hope you find the rest of interest. I don’t know if anyone is reading my reporting on vaccines, but I will continue to do it. I am not a member of some ideological group. I am analytical. I try to criticize the entire political spectrum.
I purchased this from a coworker’s wife who lives in a suburb way outside Dallas. I joke with them that when I vist from Dallas I am afraid that I fall off of the edge of the world. (They have a sense of humor.)
She had this item on a work table and I asked if I could buy it. I paid $10 over the asking price. Even so I thought it was a bargain.
I think that Gay art can take many forms. I did a photo study of it.
This is the light shining through it. The shadows have colors.
Front view. There are irridescent bits in the piece, but they didn’t photograph.
I think pride merchandise can be really good. Perhaps if we would purchase quality items, quality items would be made.
Stop complaining about Pride merchandise
The Malaysian police raided swatch stores and confiscated the Pride watches.
Yes, a lot of it is just slapping a rainbow on things, but it is also a sign that we exist in a society where such bad merchandise is possible. Also, whereas we take it for granted and sneer, anti-Gay societies realize that is a real threat to their homophobic regime.
mRNA panel discussion and the importance to Gays.
I think Gays don’t realize that they can have influence in getting vaccines against STDs available so they just wait for the news to announce it. We can have an influence and we can affect results. That is why I am reporting on vaccines for HIV and other STDS. We should be asking those seeking our vote how they support vaccine research. We should be raising the issue when there is no vaccine effort underway.
mRNA vaccine technology has a lot of abilities which make it likely to be able to make the first successful HIV vaccine. mRNA vaccines are being developed for other Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) also. The following article summarizes a panel discussion on the future of mRNA technology and they have the video of the panel discussion. The mRNA discussion starts at 1 hour 55 minutes.
The article talks about vaccines for cancer. Also, therapies for diabetics and automimmune diseases where the mRNA will produce the proteins that the patients now normally have to inject routinely.
My sense from the article is that there are hundreds of possible applications of mRNA technology. Even though Moderna has 40 mRNA trials ongoing, it is going to take a while to exploit the power of mRNA technology fully. Which means it might be a while until mRNA technology is applied to a specific STD.
The priorities seem to be medical problems that are significant and have a high probability of success and that makes good sense. For Moderna that makes business sense. Successful vaccines will result in cash flow and fund further research and provide the motivation for further research.
What is the Gay agenda here?
1. There is a risk that when mRNA vaccines come out for HIV, herpes, and other STDs, we might not be able to get them because of anti-vaxxer anti-mRNA beliefs. There was a proposal to make mRNA vaccines illegal in Montana. We need to be alert and support policies which support mRNA vaccines.
2. When vaccines for HIV, Herpes, and other STDs come out we need to support getting the community vaccinated. We can’t have a reservoir of HIV and other diseases because people can’t afford the vaccine.
3. When vaccines for HIV, Herpes, and other STDs come out we need to point out the risks of anti-vaxxer Gays. When they are ranting about Covid mRNA vaccines, they probably aren’t getting the vaccines that are already available, and won’t be getting the HIV and Herpes mRNA vaccines.
4. We need to support government research into getting vaccines for STDs. I am not seeing much on syphilis. For gonorrhea there is some work, but for some reason that isn’t any mRNA vaccine being discussed. There might be a reason for that, but I can’t find it and the LGBTQXYZ media doesn’t seem to care.
5. Since anti-Gay Christians are the demographic which is most likely to be anti-vaxxer, Gays need to realize that getting vaccinated gives us a strategic advantage over our enemies.
When Gays are in forums, political clubs, action groups etc. they need to raise the issue of vaccines for STDs.
Trans extremist hegemony is breaking down.
PinkNews is screaming about a British TV show the “Gender Wars” but this is the view of the Guardian. They are hardly a conservative news outlet.
I say trans extremists, since most trans are not part of this repressive movement. Most trans people deserve your support and understanding.
What the Guardian commentary shows it that trans extremism has lost its ability to intimidate and suppress alternate views. Pink News is raging about this show.
https://twitter.com/PinkNews/status/1663827822878629896
I don’t know if you have to be a paid subscriber at the following site.
https://www.channel4.com/programmes/gender-wars
Detransitioning debacle up ahead for gender and queer theorists.
I came across this group recently. Some trans extremists were complaining about it, and therefore giving it publicity.
https://www.transitionjustice.org/
It is supposed to be a project of Partners for Ethical Care, but I don’t know who they might really be. It could be a front group for the religious right.
https://www.partnersforethicalcare.com/
As was reported in this newsletter earlier the percentage those detransitioning in 4 years is fairly high, way too high for something that has irreversible impacts. The journal is published by Oxford University press.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/107/9/e3937/6572526
Detransitionaing is not rare. The percentage in four years is 30%, and the percentage is likely to be higher in five or six years if you interviewed people five or six years after they originally started to transition. Further, some will feel that they have made an irreversible commitment and not be willing to stop regardless how they feel about it.
I think for such a radical intervention the selection process for transitioning should be such that detransitioning should be 1% or less.
We are going to be seeing a lot of people on television and social media platforms telling their tragic story. And there will be more to come. There are a lot of people who started transitioning, but haven’t been doing it long enough to be disillusioned.
Also, there has been a lot of pressure on people to not detransition, and denunciation of those who do. And there has been the lie that transitioning is rare, so individuals when they think they might want to detransition are led to believe they would be one of the few failures.
Once there are many detransitioners in the media the trans extremists won’t be able to target on any one detransitioner, and their intimidation tactics will no longer be effective.
People currently transitioning will be more open to the idea that perhaps it was a mistake and that many people were wrongly convinced to transition and maybe they got pushed into it. They would be thinking that they were a failure, but the failure was telling them they were trans.
As there are more and more detransitioners in the media they will be embolden to be angry, and then be really angry.
When the Recovered Memory thing was finally exposed as nonsense, there were people that were angry and others really disapproving that it had happened.
But with hundreds of young people crying their hearts out on media, there are going to be millions of people really, really angry.
This is going to be bad for legitimate trans concerns and those who are truly trans. When there is an excess, the backlash to that excess is usually excessive itself. That is why suppressing debate is not really helpful for a cause.
And this is going to be bad for Lesbians and Gays, because they were attached to these excesses through initialism (i.e. LGBTQXYZ), that is being force teamed with people who had no sense.
We need to make sure we do two things.
1. Keep documentation of which individuals, media, publications, professors, organizations were involved make sure they don’t escape the consequences of their actions.
2. Start afresh. We can’t go back to the 1980s. We need to design a new movement based on new ideas.
The real issue with this Facebook group is that it is a trans run group and the admins don’t have penises.
I am not going to mention their name, since I don’t want to give them publicity. I make sure that all the Gay Facebook groups in my post on Gay Facebook groups are actually Gay groups and not some anti-penis transman group.
That is why they aren’t on my post on Facebook groups for Gay art. They don’t have much of interest to Gays either.
r/gaytransguys
This is tragic in a way. The person never did see the transman as a man.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gaytransguys/comments/13tks0v/relationship_is_over/
Thinks Gay men are too Gay. Turns out the transman is autistic. Instead of considering that he has a different perspective on things, he instead wants the Gay community be less Gay.
Gay person gives a pre-ops “Gay” transman real advice and transman is upset. Gay person said that with breasts the transman wouldn’t attract much Gay interest. Transman thinks it isn’t a problem and Gay men already find transman and transman’s breasts attractive. The transman doesn’t realize that these “Gays” the transman is supposedly meeting are actually straight guys and choses to denounce the Gay person. DO NOT ENGAGE WITH THEM.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gaytransguys/comments/13wde6j/my_experiences_with_gay_cis_men_and_my_chest/
Not able to have vaginal penetration with chasers anymore and discovers that not really able to have anal sex either. Doesn’t have money for doctors for this, and left basically stranded in a no sex situation.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gaytransguys/comments/13w351z/trying_anal_a_few_worries/
Finds out that hookup apps are full of straight guys looking for easy sex with transmen.
Weight loss tips and tricks
Maybe most everyone knows this, but I didn’t realize how this really helped me to change my eating habits.
Sharp kitchen cutting tools: I mean quality ones. Those fancy Japanese cutting tools, one for vegetables and one for meat. Make sure the meat cleaver is good for chopping through bones.
I would buy apples but not eat them. I would get grapefruits and not eat them. I really didn’t want to bite into apples. That is the way they show apples being eaten, but I don’t like to do it that way. The way of eating grapefruit of spooning them can be messy with juice going everywhere. I want to eat my grapefruit while at the computer doing work.
Now with a sharp vegetable blade, I could cut them up very thinly and they make great snacks. Easy to eat while on the computer. Sharpe tools make cutting things really easy and less messy. Juice isn’t squirting everywhere. You can cut easy thin wedges. Sharp tools go through fruit easily and it is less work and fast. and reduces work. You can cut up things and have small meals.
The meat cleaver allows cutting up chicken quickly into small pieces so you can add chicken to dishes of mostly vegetables and not eating meat in large chunks.
Some info on hurricanes. Is this a Gay issue or not?
I am not sure if this is a Gay issue or not. In the coastal states, the major Gay neighborhoods are in coastal cities. However, the general population is concentrated on the coast also. So, the exposure to hurricane risk might be incrementally higher to Gays than straights, but does that make it a Gay issue?
The counter argument might be that even if it is just incremental in terms of demographics, most of the Gay neighborhoods are certainly at risk.
But the counter-counter argument might be the security of those neighborhoods will be through the same means that protects the whole city or area in which the Gay neighborhood exists. There isn’t a specific action for Gays, that wouldn’t be the actions that everyone there would do.
The counter-counter-counter argument (academics don’t know when to stop) would be that emergency services and support might be by groups with policies that aren’t supportive of Gays whether by intention or not. If homeless shelters are family first, and your house is knocked down where will you stay? If one of you ends up at a local hospital run by an anti-Gay Christian denomination, is that a good situation? Will recover efforts be biased against your neighborhood? Do you want to be receiving food and water handouts for the First Baptist We Hate Gays Church?
Then I am concerned that Gay agendas get hijacked by something that isn’t really a Gay item. So I am writing this to start thinking about this issue, and invite others to input their thoughts in the comments.
My belief is that Gays need to be as self-reliant as possible, because we live in a world that can be hostile and we might end up in a bad situation because help will be denied.
Subscriptions are free.