The Tiktok thing that will help destroy gender ideology and queer theory.
I am really don't know if this is really a brilliant trolling effort or she actually believes what she is saying. It totally destroys what Harry Nicholas is trying to do.
Subscriptions are free
Feel free to skip this post or stop reading it at anypoint to avoid watching these tiktoks. She is a phenomenon and so I have to report it, but this is a really unpleasant post. At the end of this post is the link to other posts on TikTok crazies.
Tiktok troll or does she actually believes what she says?
These videos are so obnoxious it occurs to me that perhaps she is a troll. The combination of self-rightous arrogance, conceit, condescension, smugness combined with a demented style of presentation is surely not helping the gender cause or queer theory advocates. Update: She isn’t a troll.
I have seen some of her videos on twitter and I thought perhaps she was some stray individual, but it turns our that as of 3/10/2023 she has 416.8K followes and 10.4 Million likes.
This is her account on twitter.
https://www.tiktok.com/@fuzzz99
The Tiktok fuzzz99 videos seem a little suspicious. First thing is that they seem skillfully constructed to make gender theorists and queer theorists seem rIdiculous. They are well produced, though made to seem like she produced them as an amateur. Her over the top performance leads you to think that she is totally authentic and not disingenous or trolling when she creates them. Yet they seem to be created to demolish queer theory and gender theory. Though it might be she is a true believer and in producing these Tiktoks is sincerely oblivious to their demolition of queer and gender theory.
Observe this following Tiktok. The question she posts is the following:
If you’re pronouns are he/they and you’re in a relationship with a woman, why do you call urself gay?
The answers given are as follows:
Your pronouns don’t equal your gender.
And then states.
You can identity as any gender you want and use whatever pronouns make you feel you most comfortable. Meaning you can identify as a male, but use She/Her pronouns if that’s what you like.
I identify as just me. Whatever that is. I’m just me baby. And I like to use Gay as an umbrella term like queer people use queer for themselves. Because that’s what feels most right to me. Duh.
This is contrary to gender theory and the trans movement. Pronouns are to communicate to people what your gender is. Misgendering is seen as the great offense and pronouns are to inform you what a person’s gender is so you don’t misgender. If a person wants to be treated as a man, but uses the pronouns she/her, likely they will be misgendered or an individual will be at a total loss as to how to treat the individual.
Gender theorists assert that homogender is the definition of Gay, versus homosexual. fuzzz99 explodes any meaning that Gay might have in any framework. This video isn’t going to impact those who think Gay is homosexual, but it undermines those who previously thought it meant homogender and this tiktok demolishes and undercuts gender theorists.
As of the evening of 3/10/2023 this video got 144.1k likes and 54k shares. This video is a major blow against gender theory and queer theory. It seems also that many of the supporters of gender theory and queer theory are just cosplaying social justice warriors and just want to feel radical but have no coherent thinking about gender or queer theory or realize that this tiktok is demolishing gender theory.
More subtly this video seems to communicate that gender theory is whatever incoherent mess that a self-absorbed individual wants it to be to serve their own irrational emotional needs and that mess will be unthinkingly supported by the LGBTQXYZ when it is position as some rebellion against oppression.
Even a Gay person desperate to be the most avant-garde advanced thinker will find the assertions in the above TikTok too much to accept.
fuzzz99 seems to go out of the way to be offensive to Gays. Harry Nicholas has written, “A Trans Man Walks into a Gay Bar,” to gain acceptance of transmen Gays and fuzzz99 blows up whatever hopes Nicholas might have had to be the face of transmen. Instead it will be fuzzz99, an obese woman who doesn’t pass at all.
This following video is where she takes the meaning out of the word Gay. We use words to communicate meanings. It is not oppressive that words have meaning. Afterall, how would a visit to the supermarket work if none of the packages or can goods or bags of frozen foods have any indication of of what they were.
If I want to tell you something, like watch out for that rock, or that tree is beautiful, or the coffee is on the bottom shelf, “rock”, “tree,” “coffee,” “shelf” have to have some type of meaning.
For fuzzz99, any type of fixed meaning or restricted meaning or meaning itself is represented as oppression. She works to demolish the linguistics of queer and gender theory.
The tiktoks keep playing in series so the next tiktok might appear. Just refresh the page.
Don’t feel at all obligated to watch the rest of these Tiktoks.
fuzzz99 isn’t logically consistent. Whereas she demolishes taxonomy in discussing her “Gay” identity, she still wants to support taxonomy as shown in this video. This video also shows how the LGBTQXYZ has become basically the production and consumption of identities of ever more complex taxonomies.
Some other videos to give a range of her seeming derangements.
This video makes me suspect she is trolling.
This sounds like fujoshi themes in BL movies and series.
Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser
What is “trans” supposed to mean if anything after this video.
Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser
If you want to watch more of these Tiktoks, as opposed to hammering a nail into your skull or setting your toes on fire, or putting bamboo splits under your nails, you can go to her Tiktok site.
Again, I think fuzzz99 will be one of the great forces bringing down gender theory and queer theory to demolish any logic it might have and make both fields seem insane.
Subscriptions are free.
My impression of queer theory, and all the rest of the postmodernist deconstructionist twaddle it's connected with, is that it's against the whole concept that words actually have meanings that tie to things in the real world, or even logical internal consistency. So this stuff is perfectly consistent with it.