Vasectomies, Abortion, Bisexuals and Gays
Angry women are threatening men who don't get vasectomies.
So this is what is popular on Facebook with “social justice warriors.”
This person calls out for all “cis men” to get a vasectomy because of the recent abortion ruling. It is wrong for the government to appropriate women’s bodies, but it is evidently okay for her to appropriate the bodies of men. I think also this request to have men’s sex organs cut is a thinly masked anger at men. Let’s call this woman desiring compulsory surgery for men, Madam X.
So a lot of straight guys were in the thread commenting that they got their vasectomies and were very happy.
My comment was “I think you mean cis straight men.” Gays aren’t making babies.
Madam X stated, “Bi cis men too.”
I said, “Yes, Also pan.” Why not. Those claiming to be pan shouldn’t escape this fate.
Later she modified her statement to include all sorts of types of people.
What made the conversation interesting is when I stated, “This would have repercussions on the bi guys acceptability in the Gay community. But that is their problem not mine.”
She asked me to explain how it would impact bi men and I suggested that Facebook wasn’t a good place to do it.
So a Bi guy got involved and told me that vasectomies don’t impact ejaculation and the semen. I replied that I would look into it.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36010/
From the article:
Viscosity, due to a lack of spermatozoa, decreased from 3.76 to 2.58 following vasectomy.
Basically, the semen would be significantly watery. (3.76/2.58 = 1.46) This is a big drop in viscosity.
Without the sperm it would be significantly clearer, less whitish, since sperm wouldn’t be present to scatter light. It is microscope droplets in milk, that scatter light and make it white. It is microscopic particles of titanium dioxide that makes white paint white. They scatter light.
The government didn’t have anyone taste it.
It is also going to be a lot less viscoelastic, its abilities to string between your fingers is going to be less. If it puddles on you they are going to be significantly different puddles.
More importantly is that ejaculation, that is the ejection of a fluid being pushed through a tube is going to be much different. The less viscous liquid will flow much faster.
So the color, thickness of the cum would look watery and the ejaculation would likely be more like peeing rather than ropy strings of cum.
Now for some Gays this isn’t going to matter. However, for some Gays it will matter. Cum enters into sex play. Gays eat it, shoot it on each other, watch it drip on the body, shoot onto mirrors, some have bukkake sessions and other things. As a much more watery liquid it is going to be different.
Pointing out that there was a viscosity change got a negative reaction. The bi guy said he didn’t know anyone who would care and snidely ended his comment, “but my experience is not all-encompassing.”
Someone, for whom I was not able to determine a sexual identity, gave a technical analysis that it wouldn’t be important. It was somewhat obvious the person didn’t know anything about Gay sex. Being a typical social justice warrior (SJW) he couldn’t resist a personal attack and said.
Anyone who would end a sexual relationship over their partner's vasectomy causing that small of a change is probably someone not worth having a relationship with anyway.
SJW’s comment sounds like something out of the straight world where sex only happens between married partners. The concept that people are out there having recreational sex seems to be unknown to him.
Of course he was looking for a means to say that even considering the issue of watery cum makes you a bad person. Madam X liked SJW’s comment.
Neither of them consider that not knowing about the Gay world they aren’t qualified to comment.
It doesn’t occur to Madam X or SJW that these screeching rages are exactly what has undermined support for feminism. Calling out for compulsory vasectomies isn’t really appealing.
Also, it shows that screeching rages is the beginning and end of their debating abilities and that they haven’t realized that these rages have proven to powerless to prevent the recent Supreme Court decision on abortion and perhaps have helped make it happen.
It also doesn’t occur to Madam X this call for vasectomies reinforces stereotypes of women being emotionally driven.
Finally, what does this say about this persons view of sex. It isn’t something you do because it is enjoyable, it is something to give to me for something in exchange or as a form of control, and maybe now you can withhold it to demand vasectomies. Without a moment’s hesitation Madam X reveals that she understands sex is something to be used to control men.
The Gay community needs to understand that certain segments of the feminist movement are not going to make good allies.