Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Blatt's avatar

Queerphobic? Is it because you are resisting subsuming discussions of issues particular to gay men into a "queer" identity.

this question is on my mind today because last night I began a book on George Platt Lynes, a mid-20th century photographer whose oeuvre including fashion photography and homoerotic imagery. His pictures of men help define a certain gay male aesthetic. And yet the book calls his work "queer". I'll continue with the book, but wonder at the authors' choice to eschew the word "gay male" and replace it with "queer"...

There is a gay male sensibility, not uniform across the diverse universe of gay men, just as there is a lesbian sensibility, each distinct from the other.... It is important that they be studied and understood so we can see what makes them unique. And also to see the common themes they address.

But, if it's subsumed into "queer", will those distinctions and that uniqueness be lost?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts