Bypassing the "Queer" Inc. Media, Alternatives to to undermine Gender ideologues. Update.
The Alphabet Soup, LGBTQXYZ media neglects the interests of Gays. The neoliberal agenda avoids certain issues. Respectability Gays avoid yet other issues. These are opportunities for us.
Subscriptions are free.
Introduction
It has started to occur to me that we should try to organize in other ways rather than competing in political organizing in opposing the Queer establishment. The Alphabet Soup and neoliberal Democrats seem to have convinced activist Gays in general that theirs is the direction we should take. I don’t think there is much progress that can be made by directly competing in political organizing.
Debating gender ideology is to debate them on their terrain, on their home ground. The average Gay person isn’t going to be interested in involved gender theory discussions. What the average Gay person is going to be interested in is when their wants are being thwarted.
I think we should address issues that either the Alphabet Soup won’t or can’t address. Also, issues which don’t take up a lot of resources and can be done by one or two of us.
Art with nudes is one they obviously can’t handle. Art also builds identity. Also, male nudes make it clear that some transman claiming to be Gay isn’t a man.
I just have to construct pages in which I provide links to resources. With about 15 to 30 minutes a week, I will end up with a fairly good resource that will attract the interest of Gays outside of the activist groups. I can by pass the Queer Inc. media.
However, there are other topics I am beginning to pick up on.
Vaccination is one issue. Anti-Gay Christians are the group most likely to be anti-vaxxers. Gays by having high vaccination rate have a strategic advantage over anti-Gay Christians. Anti-Gay Christians have been dying all over the world because of their anti-vax stance. I think there are ways the vaccination rate can be raised even higher for Gays.
The Democrats won’t want to focus on this because, as they would whine, it is divisive. I found that sharing my writing on anti-Gay Christians at https://www.sorryantivaxxer.com/ got strong interest, even a straight guy wanted to let me know that he supports us.
Educating the public that anti-Gay Christians are most likely to be anti-vaxxers can help gain support for Gays. In Korea, the Covid outbreak cause by fringe Christian groups has given right-wing Christians a bad image with the Korean public. These anti-Gay Christians in Korea are sometimes violent in trying to stop Gay events. I reported on this earlier and I will provide a link to the article at the end of this post.
UPDATE: Failure to protect the LGBT.
The LGBTQXYZ establishment raises issues of homophobia when it is useful for their agenda. When it isn’t useful they aren’t interested.
I am working locally and when going up against homophobia is inconvenient they just ignore the issue.
Where I live the local LGBTQXYZ establishment doesn’t report on radical groups engaged in counter-protests against anti-drag protests. The local Stonewall dems played a game where online they were supporting the counter-protest, but didn’t show up with their banner or as group, and told me they were their as individuals.
We have a church calling for the execution of homosexuals and the local Alphabet Soup isn’t doing much of anything because they don’t approve of the radicals involved.
I report what the radicals are doing and I make sure people know how hard they are working. Further I report on what the local Alphabet Soup isn’t doing.
Not being an ideological scold and having a policy of a broad alliance to move forward, I don’t care what their ideology is, what I can care about is whether they are fighting for the Gay interest. I also support LGBT alliances when it is supporting the interest of all the letters.
The local LGBTQXYZ is failing to defend the interests of the LGBT in my city, and further they erase the efforts of those that do. I am getting huge interest in my fighting for what the LGBTQXYZ won’t fight for.
Movie reviews might be an area to consider. Now you have “queer” film festivals and maybe only a fraction oriented to Gays and of those they are likely to be lecturing or ideological. I am not saying that no Gay movie should be lecturing or ideological, but I don’t think it is necessary for all of them to be so. Also, in these “queer” film festivals a lot of the ideology and lecturing is likely to be asserting ideology that is anti-Gay and or sexually repressive or telling Gays they need to have a certain opinion.
Some of these movies really have assimilation has their objective or push the values of Respectability Gays. The idea that the objective of our lives is marriage and adoption of some children.
Putting on a Queer festival takes a lot of people and resources. Having a webpage with links doesn’t take that much resources.
I don’t think I could do movie reviews, but I think someone might take up doing a movie reviews to identify movies of Gay interest, and also to warn Gays against stuff that is misrepresented to Gays or basically some ideologue lecturing Gays.
I might create a Gay movie page. Movies for the Gay community without lectures.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) are another issue. Gays get them more often than other segments of the public as a generally more sexually active population. The Respectability Gays are embarrassed by the issue. This is a real material issue for Gays and progress in preventing and treating STDs would greatly benefit Gays. I brought up the issue of STDs in the local Stonewall Democratic club and one guy had a fit.
I have begun to have a webpage on HIV and will be getting together a Health page. I have a Masters of Science degree and so this is somewhat easy for me to do.
I will put links at the end of this post.
Push back against Anti-Gay Christianity could be done in more substantial ways than it can be done now. There are things we could do but don’t because neoliberals would think it is divisive. I will put a link at the end of this post.
Kink at Pride is a definite area for organizing. I am not into it, but I am not upset with it either. However, it is hated by Respectability Gays and it seems the other letters are squeamish or hostile to kink. Asexuals don’t like it, and Lesbians complain about it or denounce it. The fact that tiny little groups think they can dictate to Gays and colonize our events is most evident when the non-binary bi identified asexual decides that there shouldn’t be kink at the Pride event. I did bring this up in an article, but one of several issues. I will provide a link at the end of this post.
I make sure I cover the issue when some member of the Alphabet Soup wants to ban it from pride. For the art page I include that type of art. I don’t know if I am the best judge of it, but I do my best.
Police at Pride is a definite issue are to focus on. The presence of uniformed police at “Pride” parades has a very real effect on the safety and security of Gay people. The opposition is just emotional showboating of leftist pieties and are people basically persons who are not really concerned about the welfare of the Gay community. These are also usually the very people screaming that Gay men should date transmen. I wrote a couple essays and will put them in a link at the end of this post.
Censorship of Porn is another area to have some type of plan. NO, I am not doing a Porn page. What I think would be good is to have a position of not being repressive towards it and being opposed to its repression. Gender studies groups are probably against it. I found the leader of one anti-porn website was the former head of a Genders studies department.
I noticed that the LGBTQXYZ media didn’t deal with the OnlyFans issue when the OnlyFans decided they were going to kick off their platform all the sex performers. OnlyFans has a lot of Gay performers supplementing their income. It was picked up by other media and also OnlyFans realized that they might be nothing without the sex performers.
I think porn offers an issue in which the difference between the respectability Gays, the “queer” academics, and the LGBTQXYZ Democrats and the everyday Gay person can be made clear. I had an article on Medium about this, but I haven’t republished it since my Medium site was banned.
I am not sure at the moment what other issues will offer an opportunity and which the LGBTQXYZ won’t or can’t pursue. What issues should we pick up regarding sex workers, or are they the truly forsaken?
Think about what the average Gay person is interested in and what the Queer Inc. won’t deal with or is hostile to and focus on that.
LINKS AT THE END OF THE NEWSLETTER